| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 33 U 1212/14 | 31.01.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 270/17 | 04.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 20. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 5 R 2625/14 | 20.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 20. August 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 KA 153/15 | 25.11.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 93/15 | 31.08.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 20. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 13 AS 455/15 | 01.07.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 219/16 E | 08.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. August 2019 | |
| - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 394/16 KL | 20.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. August 2019 | |||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 8 KR 835/19 ER | 19.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1393/19 ER-B | 17.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 KR 463/19 ER | 10.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1470/19 ER-B | 11.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 KR 871/18 | 14.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 4533/18 | 23.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 KR 2656/17 | 05.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 4475/18 | 23.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 5 KR 4603/17 | 21.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3507/18 | 23.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 KR 4514/17 | 31.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 498/19 | 23.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 R 1629/15 | 11.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 316/19 | 06.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 13 KR 1185/17 | 05.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1859/18 | 06.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 4 KR 2895/16 | 30.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2643/17 | 06.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 11 R 3372/17 | 18.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 BA 3027/18 | 08.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 12 R 1221/17 | 28.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 756/19 | 01.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 AS 1966/18 | 28.06.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 19. August 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 17 R 640/14 | 28.05.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 578/15 | 26.01.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 5/17 R | 12.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 14 AS 3133/18 ER | 30.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 125/19 B ER und L 2 AS 126/19 B | 15.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 15. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 39 U 234/15 | 04.05.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 103/17 | 28.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 9/19 R | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 331/14 | 12.04.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 91/17 | 01.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 3 U 4036/16 | 22.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 4094/17 | 22.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 10 U 387/13 | 30.03.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 305/15 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 15. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 KN 666/14 | 30.08.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 KN 826/17 | 01.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 RS 232/17 | 13.12.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 142/18 ZV | 05.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. August 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 486 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 486 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 486 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 12125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 270/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-270-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-270-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144750 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 R 2625/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-r-2625-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-r-2625-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144361 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KA 153/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ka-153-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:51:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:51:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ka-153-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 219/16 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-219-16-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-219-16-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129465 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 394/16 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-394-16-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-394-16-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153084 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1393/19 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1393-19-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1393-19-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153080 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1470/19 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1470-19-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1470-19-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 4533/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-4533-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-4533-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 4475/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-4475-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-4475-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3507/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3507-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3507-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153064 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 498/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-498-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-498-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153060 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 316/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-316-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-316-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1859/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1859-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:57:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:57:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1859-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2643/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2643-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:57:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:57:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2643-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153048 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 3027/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-3027-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:57:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:57:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-3027-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 756/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-756-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:57:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:57:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-756-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 AS 1966/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-as-1966-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-as-1966-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 123147 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 R 578/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-r-578-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:51:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:51:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-r-578-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161348 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 125/19 B ER und L 2 AS 126/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-125-19-b-er-und-l-2-as-126-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-125-19-b-er-und-l-2-as-126-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 103/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-103-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-103-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160026 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 91/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-91-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-91-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152969 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 4094/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-4094-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:57:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:57:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-4094-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 U 387/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-u-387-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-u-387-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160023 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KN 826/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kn-826-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kn-826-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160019 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 142/18 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-142-18-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-142-18-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 270/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-270-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-270-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 32db6ec3b765d599e62931feb0f1c17e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:457dafe6716a31731778636682fd6780:0.16659500 1758744260 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.