| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 16 KR 154/21 | 28.07.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 377/22 | 30.01.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 R 15/22 ZV | 10.10.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 485/23 ZV | 16.05.2024 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 24 AS 232/24 ER | 08.03.2024 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 142/24 B ER | 22.05.2024 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 29 R 250/22 | 18.04.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 27. Mai 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 4 U 1125/20 | 23.03.2022 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 350/22 | 29.02.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Meiningen | 27. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 126 AS 2731/21 | 20.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 684/22 | 24.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 17 VG 2202/19 | 24.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 2760/23 | 29.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 4 AS 166/23 | 19.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 1778/23 | 17.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 160/22 | 17.05.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 23. Mai 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 32 AS 65/24 | 22.05.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 23. Mai 2024 | ||||
| Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 9/23 KL | 08.05.2024 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Mai 2024 | ||||
| Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 9/23 KL | 19.04.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 9/24 R | - | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 KR 4017/20 | 29.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3206/22 | 22.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 11 KR 2415/21 | 19.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3178/23 | 22.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 U 1581/22 | 14.04.2023 | L 6 U 1244/23 | 25.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Mai 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 SO 346/24 ER | 29.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 868/24 ER-B | 14.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 22 KR 1371/18 | 18.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 483/21 KH | 18.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 EG 3/19 | 11.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 21. Mai 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 BA 63/22 | 13.07.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 SF 46/24 AB | 13.05.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Mai 2024 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 KR 311/20 KL | 24.04.2024 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Mai 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 5 AS 2336/21 | 20.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 1041/23 | 21.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Mai 2024 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SF 1395/23 EK KR | 20.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Mai 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 11 BA 2251/19 | 20.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 BA 3361/21 | 20.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 27 SO 159/17 | 22.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 120/20 | 20.03.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 17. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 24 R 37/21 | 05.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 563/21 | 11.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 1/24 AR | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 17. Mai 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 49 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 49 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 49 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1200, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 377/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-377-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-377-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161491 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 485/23 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-485-23-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-485-23-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161489 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 142/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-142-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-142-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131536 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 R 250/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-r-250-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:58:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:58:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-r-250-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131023 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 350/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-350-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-350-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 684/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-684-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-684-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160437 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 2760/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-2760-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-2760-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160434 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1778/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1778-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1778-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 160/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-160-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-160-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137157 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AS 65/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-as-65-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-as-65-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 9/23 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-9-23-kl-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-9-23-kl-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 9/23 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-9-23-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-9-23-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160431 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 3206/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-3206-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-3206-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 3178/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-3178-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-3178-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160425 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 1244/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-1244-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-1244-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160422 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 868/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-868-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-868-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150692 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 483/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-483-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:55:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:55:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-483-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150083 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 EG 3/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-eg-3-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-eg-3-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 SF 46/24 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-sf-46-24-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-sf-46-24-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 311/20 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-311-20-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-311-20-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160418 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1041/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1041-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1041-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160415 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SF 1395/23 EK KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sf-1395-23-ek-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sf-1395-23-ek-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160412 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 3361/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-3361-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-3361-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137356 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 SO 159/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-so-159-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-so-159-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134883 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 R 37/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-r-37-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-r-37-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 377/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-377-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-377-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 6f4f6d9fd84eb8dc42a4014b40129b85 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:35601bd167d3deac438f500cde81c8d9:0.60207600 1745276855 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.