Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 48 SO 235/24 ER | 08.08.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 245/24 B ER | 29.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 22 SO 139/21 | 05.05.2023 | L 9 SO 180/23 | 10.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2024 | |||
Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 56/24 KL | 10.10.2024 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||||
- | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SF 15/24 EK AS PKH | 10.05.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 SF 1/24 R | 04.11.2024 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 46 AS 1243/23 | 21.11.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 5. Dezember 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 4 AL 135/21 | 26.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AL 30/23 | 30.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KR 2302/23 | 13.11.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 5. Dezember 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 12 R 765/21 | 26.01.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 SV 6/22 B | 28.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 SF 1/22 R | 31.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. Dezember 2024 |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 28 P 1101/21 | 14.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 1402/21 B | 22.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 SF 1/21 R | 12.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. Dezember 2024 |
Sozialgericht Kiel | S 44 BA 528/18 | 19.11.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 BA 52/18 | 07.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 2/22 R | 12.06.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. Dezember 2024 |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 16 AS 2347/21 | 08.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1044/22 | 03.08.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 15/23 R | 24.09.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. Dezember 2024 |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 BA 1042/21 | 16.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 BA 3866/21 | 23.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 R 3478/20 | 01.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 3620/22 | 20.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 3 SO 1228/24 ER | 21.10.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 3118/24 ER-B | 02.12.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 SO 2246/23 | 29.04.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1694/24 | 26.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 P 298/24 | 08.05.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 1773/24 | 23.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Hannover | S 39 AS 2553/19 | 18.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 75/21 | 29.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 64 KR 597/19 | 19.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 131/23 | 21.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 64 KR 597/19 | 19.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 131/23 | 21.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 686/16 | 29.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 6/20 | 22.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 8/23 R | 28.08.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Dezember 2024 |
- | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 SF 9/22 S | 29.11.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Dresden | S 51 AS 3564/19 | 24.06.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AS 566/20 | 08.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 44/23 B | 20.09.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Dezember 2024 |
- | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 438/20 KL ZVW | 09.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 22/22 R | 05.09.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 26/21 KL | 26.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 5/23 R | 05.09.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 2 U 10/20 | 16.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 148/20 | 10.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 8/22 R | 27.06.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Dezember 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 5 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 5 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 5 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151026 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 245/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-245-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-245-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151025 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 180/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-180-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-180-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 56/24 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-56-24-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-56-24-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SF 15/24 EK AS PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sf-15-24-ek-as-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sf-15-24-ek-as-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144053 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 AS 1243/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-as-1243-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:46:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:46:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-as-1243-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139681 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AL 30/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-al-30-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-al-30-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133026 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KR 2302/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-kr-2302-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-kr-2302-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88186 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 SF 1/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-sf-1-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:23:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:23:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-sf-1-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 SF 1/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-sf-1-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-sf-1-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 BA 2/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ba-2-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ba-2-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88183 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 15/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-15-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-15-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 3866/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-3866-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-3866-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161183 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 3620/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-3620-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-3620-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 3118/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-3118-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-3118-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161179 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1694/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1694-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1694-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161177 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 1773/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-1773-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-1773-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139674 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 75/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-75-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-75-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 131/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-131-23-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-131-23-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 131/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-131-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-131-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88182 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 8/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-8-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-8-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 SF 9/22 S [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-sf-9-22-s [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-sf-9-22-s/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88180 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 44/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-44-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-44-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88179 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 22/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-22-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-22-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88178 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 5/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-5-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-5-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88177 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 8/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-8-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-8-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151026 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 245/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-245-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-245-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 93c5719c894ee6cc99b7b5283e7f80e2 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.