| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KR 1352/21 KH | 14.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 517/22 KH | 25.04.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 33/24 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. Mai 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 33 R 1003/20 | 11.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 662/21 | 09.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 5/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. Mai 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 7 R 538/22 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 539/23 | 17.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 R 397/18 | 27.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 195/22 | 20.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 17/24 AR | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. Mai 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 R 110/22 | 11.04.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 100/23 | 18.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 6/24 BH | 04.04.2024 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 16. Mai 2024 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 49 KA 5037/23 | 29.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 16. Mai 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 39 KR 876/18 | 18.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 16. Mai 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 6 R 201/20 | 06.01.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 36/23 | 23.04.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 16. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 25 AS 1055/19 | 05.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 1043/23 | 26.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 BA 2389/21 | 14.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 BA 37/22 | 20.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 R 339/23 | 21.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1856/23 | 17.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 629/21 | 17.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 472/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 628/21 | 17.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 471/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 597/21 | 17.01.2022 | L 11 KR 469/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 613/21 | 17.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 470/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 595/21 | 14.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 467/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 593/21 | 14.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 465/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 594/21 | 14.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 466/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 592/21 | 14.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 464/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 596/21 | 17.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 468/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 591/21 | 14.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 463/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 590/21 | 13.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 462/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 587/21 | 13.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 459/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 589/21 | 13.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 461/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 KR 416/21 | 13.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 458/22 | 19.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Mai 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 50 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 50 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 50 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1225, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 517/22 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-517-22-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:54:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:54:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-517-22-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150688 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 662/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-662-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:54:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:54:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-662-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150686 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 539/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-539-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:54:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:54:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-539-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150683 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 195/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-195-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:54:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:54:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-195-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 100/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-100-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-100-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 KA 5037/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-ka-5037-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-ka-5037-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 KR 876/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-kr-876-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-kr-876-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137153 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 201/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-201-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-201-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129511 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 1043/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-1043-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-1043-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160409 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 37/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-37-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-37-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160405 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1856/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1856-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1856-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 472/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-472-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-472-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160399 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 471/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-471-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-471-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 469/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-469-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-469-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 470/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-470-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-470-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160391 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 467/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-467-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-467-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160388 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 465/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-465-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-465-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 466/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-466-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-466-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160382 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 464/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-464-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-464-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160379 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 468/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-468-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-468-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160376 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 463/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-463-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-463-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160373 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 462/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-462-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-462-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160370 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 459/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-459-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-459-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160367 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 461/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-461-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-461-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160364 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 458/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-458-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-458-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 517/22 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-517-22-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:54:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:54:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-517-22-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => aefc30396568dce5a55cb37b968a5d09 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:093692acbe24120ead064c42ba21001f:0.55883800 1745276291 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.