| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 15 R 2109/20 | 28.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 3132/22 | 15.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 AS 1649/23 | 18.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 2986/23 | 24.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 315/21 | 15.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 166/22 | 21.03.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 19. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 315/21 | 15.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 166/22 | 21.03.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 19. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 315/21 | 15.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 166/22 | 21.03.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 19. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 48 SO 454/20 | 06.04.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 109/22 | 07.07.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 R 682/22 | 27.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 2307/23 | 05.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 1987/22 | 08.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1666/23 | 28.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 1986/22 | 08.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1665/23 | 28.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 R 1856/21 | 07.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 1811/23 | 13.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 BA 414/21 | 14.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 BA 351/22 | 16.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 U 1818/22 | 17.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 1484/23 | 14.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 6 U 337/17 | 16.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 179/21 | 09.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 100/23 B | 18.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 17. April 2024 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 415/22 | 19.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 17. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 10 KR 350/21 | 13.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 17. April 2024 | ||||
| - | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 17. April 2024 | ||||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 9 P 81/23 ER | 21.08.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 P 2/24 B | 09.04.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 21 AS 3209/17 | 17.02.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AS 449/21 | 05.02.2024 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 30 KR 2565/19 | 05.01.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 84/23 NZB | 10.01.2024 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 27 AS 1413/23 ER | 24.11.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 13/24 B ER | 26.03.2024 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 21 SO 165/23 ER | 04.08.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 61/23 B ER | 11.12.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 3 AY 84/23 ER | 11.10.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 15/23 B ER | 21.12.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. April 2024 | ||
| - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 12/23 KL | 19.12.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 4 SO 72/22 ER | 28.10.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 77/22 B ER | 20.09.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 16 U 563/14 | 13.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 288/18 | 23.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 76/23 B + B 2 U 7/23 BH | 22.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. April 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 57 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 57 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 57 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1400, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160235 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 3132/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-3132-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-3132-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160232 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 2986/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-2986-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-2986-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137131 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 315/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-315-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-315-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137127 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 166/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-166-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-166-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137126 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 166/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-166-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-166-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 109/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-109-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-109-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160229 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 2307/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-2307-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-2307-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1666/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1666-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1666-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1665/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1665-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1665-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160220 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 1811/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-1811-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-1811-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160217 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 351/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-351-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-351-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160214 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 1484/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-1484-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-1484-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150621 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 179/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-179-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-179-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143977 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 415/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-415-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-415-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133717 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 350/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-350-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-350-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132855 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 P 48/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-p-48-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-p-48-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 2/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-2-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-2-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161484 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 449/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-449-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-449-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161481 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 84/23 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-84-23-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-84-23-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161479 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 13/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-13-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-13-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161477 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 61/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-61-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-61-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161475 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 15/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-15-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-15-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161473 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 12/23 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-12-23-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-12-23-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161471 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 77/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-77-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-77-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 288/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-288-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-288-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160235 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 3132/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-3132-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-3132-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 5f38e99f124378751603b393c4676510 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:65b31e2e0dddb5bd67b080f75b82c301:0.91091600 1745320592 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.