| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 7 AS 448/21 | 08.03.2022 | L 4 AS 133/22 B | 11.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 11. April 2024 | |||
| - | L 10 SF 46/21 EK | 30.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 11. April 2024 | |||||
| - | L 10 SF 47/21 EK | 30.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 11. April 2024 | |||||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 29 SB 206/19 | 23.04.2020 | L 7 SB 37/20 | 10.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 11. April 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 17 R 3768/18 | 23.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1330/21 | 26.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 22 SO 406/21 | 13.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 78/23 | 21.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 3/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. April 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 112 KR 2121/21 | 08.04.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 11. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 39 KR 80/22 | 27.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 11. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 19 AS 377/14 | 19.10.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 676/18 | 14.04.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 11. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 10 U 2818/14 | 26.09.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1364/17 | 19.12.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 11. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 40 U 289/22 | 21.06.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 168/23 | 15.01.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 KR 362/23 ER | 20.11.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 22/24 B ER | 19.03.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 2 KR 60/24 ER | 16.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 579/24 ER-B | 03.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 BA 1723/20 | 09.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 BA 1883/21 | 26.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 6 EG 1249/21 | 05.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 EG 1686/22 | 26.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 U 1156/21 | 17.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 2729/22 | 17.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 13 U 1077/22 | 03.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 1210/23 | 14.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. April 2024 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 539/23 | 17.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 104/24 RG | 12.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 7 R 695/21 | 26.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 231/22 | 06.03.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 72/24 B | 10.10.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. April 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 25 AS 31444/23 ER | 16.11.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 1664/23 B ER | 13.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 33 KR 1301/19 | 22.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 90/22 | 22.02.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 8/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. April 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 31 KR 429/22 | 15.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 71/24 B | 25.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 25 R 563/22 | 12.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 822/23 | 21.02.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 10. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 8 SF 60/23 E | 19.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 1561/23 B | 20.02.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 10. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 16 KR 200/14 | 10.12.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 791/14 B | 23.04.2015 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. April 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 59 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 59 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 59 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1450, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161797 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 133/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-133-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-133-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161796 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 46/21 EK [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-46-21-ek [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-46-21-ek/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 47/21 EK [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-47-21-ek [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-47-21-ek/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161794 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SB 37/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-sb-37-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-sb-37-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160196 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1330/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1330-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1330-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150611 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 78/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-78-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-78-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150340 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 112 KR 2121/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-112-kr-2121-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-112-kr-2121-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 KR 80/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-kr-80-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-kr-80-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137120 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 676/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-676-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-676-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131425 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1364/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1364-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1364-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130865 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 168/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-168-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-168-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 22/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-22-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-22-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 579/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-579-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-579-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160190 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 BA 1883/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ba-1883-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ba-1883-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160188 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 EG 1686/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-eg-1686-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-eg-1686-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 2729/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-2729-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-2729-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 1210/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-1210-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-1210-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150610 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 104/24 RG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-104-24-rg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-104-24-rg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 231/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-231-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-231-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150606 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 1664/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-1664-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-1664-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 90/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-90-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-90-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 71/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-71-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-71-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144949 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 822/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-822-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-822-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 1561/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-1561-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-1561-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 791/14 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-791-14-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-791-14-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161797 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 133/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-133-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-133-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 6e82e5e6d91fe2ff5c3495fb7aa3b992 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1d388890737c73bf83f38f1ad74ee7ee:0.72178500 1745345648 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.