| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 6 U 215/17 | 22.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 U 159/20 | 06.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 3/22 R | 27.06.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Dezember 2024 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 2716/20 KL | 29.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 A 1/22 R | 27.06.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Dezember 2024 | ||
| - | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 3. Dezember 2024 | ||||||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 7 U 52/16 | 01.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 213/20 | 27.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 2. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 SO 16/24 ER | 23.08.2024 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 95/24 B ER | 27.11.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 2. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 7 AS 235/21 | 22.07.2024 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 318/24 NZB | 22.11.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 122 BA 407/18 | 18.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 BA 14/22 | 27.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 199 SB 165/21 | 21.11.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 307/23 | 24.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 116 AS 3752/24 ER | 26.08.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 890/24 B ER | 18.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 15 KR 350/23 ER | 11.01.2024 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 25/24 B ER | 26.03.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 28. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 KR 334/22 | 17.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 49/24 | 15.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 R 431/21 | 03.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 3512/22 | 10.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 R 2549/20 | 19.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 3404/23 | 13.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 SO 1904/24 ER | 20.09.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 3045/24 ER-B | 19.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 10 SO 1676/22 | 06.06.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2210/24 NZB | 18.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 3354/21 | 15.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 730/24 | 18.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 U 3406/19 | 01.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3356/21 | 24.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 24 R 871/19 | 03.05.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 R 256/22 | 07.11.2024 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 17 AS 962/24 ER | 21.08.2024 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 379/24 B ER | 13.11.2024 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 32 R 414/15 | 16.07.2021 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 R 10060/21 | 06.06.2024 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 26. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 3 KR 166/24 ER | 18.09.2024 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 419/24 B ER | 30.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 26. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 10 KR 1231/19 | 20.11.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 26. November 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 14 BA 37/19 | 21.12.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 9/23 | 11.11.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 37 AS 506/23 | 20.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Oldenburg | 26. November 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 33 AS 516/17 | 19.07.2022 | L 5 AS 514/22 | 23.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 25. November 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 6 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 6 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 6 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 3/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-3-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-3-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 A 1/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-a-1-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-a-1-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132891 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 R 236/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-r-236-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-r-236-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139667 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 213/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-213-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-213-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139513 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 95/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-95-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-95-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 318/24 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-318-24-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-318-24-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 BA 14/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-ba-14-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-ba-14-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 307/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-307-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-307-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129817 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 34 AS 890/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-34-as-890-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-34-as-890-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134981 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 25/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-25-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:28:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:28:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-25-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129814 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KR 49/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kr-49-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kr-49-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 3512/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-3512-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-3512-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161173 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 3404/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-3404-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-3404-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 3045/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-3045-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-3045-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161170 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2210/24 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2210-24-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2210-24-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161168 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 730/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-730-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-730-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3356/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3356-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3356-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161521 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 256/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-256-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-256-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 379/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-379-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-379-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150588 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 10060/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-10060-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-10060-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139664 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 419/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-419-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-419-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131178 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 1231/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-1231-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-1231-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 9/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-9-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-9-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71274 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 37 AS 506/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-37-as-506-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:36:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:36:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-37-as-506-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 514/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-514-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 17:00:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 16:00:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-514-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 3/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-3-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-3-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0e0773ad4b905433b0b53beb96862bd7 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.