| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 214/24 ER | 05.04.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 9. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 SB 2378/22 | 28.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 9. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 9 SB 399/20 | 27.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 SB 60/23 | 14.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 9. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 14 U 154/19 | 20.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 U 52/23 | 21.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 9. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 19 U 37/19 | 16.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3/6 U 55/23 | 21.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 9. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 27 P 153/18 | 26.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 45/21 | 30.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 54 P 378/15 | 28.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 92/19 | 09.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 9/23 B | 19.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. April 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 44 KR 398/20 | 26.04.2021 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 189/21 | 31.01.2024 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 8. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 683/21 | 01.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 8. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 33 U 304/19 | 15.06.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 8. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 KR 362/23 ER | 20.11.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 22/24 B ER | 19.03.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 8. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 61 KR 347/17 | 04.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 206/22 | 20.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 54 KR 733/20 | 31.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 182/21 | 20.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 23 AS 1810/15 | 18.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 120/19 | 27.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 23 AS 1810/15 | 18.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 120/19 | 27.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 12 SB 14/21 | 13.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 SB 90/23 | 14.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 U 773/22 | 09.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2452/23 | 21.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 14 R 774/21 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 3453/22 | 21.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 13 U 544/20 | 11.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1819/22 | 21.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 R 2839/20 | 29.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 230/21 | 21.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 U 4003/20 | 18.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3232/21 | 22.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 U 21/21 | 11.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1953/21 | 22.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 R 2195/18 | 21.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 612/20 | 22.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 42 KR 197/21 | 04.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 129/22 | 22.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 42 KR 197/21 | 04.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 129/22 | 22.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. April 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 60 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 60 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 60 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1475, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 214/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-214-24-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-214-24-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 SB 2378/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-sb-2378-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-sb-2378-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 60/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-60-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-60-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 52/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-52-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-52-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3/6 U 55/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-6-u-55-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-6-u-55-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150598 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 45/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-45-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-45-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150596 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 92/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-92-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-92-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 189/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-189-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-189-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150336 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 89 KR 683/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-89-kr-683-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-89-kr-683-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143957 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 U 304/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-u-304-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-u-304-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140366 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 362/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-362-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-362-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 206/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-206-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-206-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 182/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-182-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-182-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AS 120/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-as-120-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-as-120-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139397 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AS 120/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-as-120-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-as-120-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 90/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-90-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-90-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160178 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2452/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2452-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2452-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 3453/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-3453-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-3453-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160172 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1819/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1819-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1819-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 230/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-230-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-230-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160166 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3232/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3232-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3232-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160163 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1953/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1953-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1953-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 612/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-612-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-612-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129469 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KR 129/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kr-129-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kr-129-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129468 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KR 129/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kr-129-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kr-129-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 214/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-214-24-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-214-24-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 42e226c19cf6aae8220892e35994aa30 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:730b775d2218f2f11e9af7b844dd6877:0.99939200 1745360549 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.