| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 183/16 KL | 16.02.2017 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. April 2024 | ||||
| Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 730/14 KL | 23.07.2017 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 18 U 74/22 | 20.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 4. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 29 R 412/21 | 12.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 4. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 U 4081/20 | 31.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1916/22 | 10.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 KR 3185/19 | 14.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1217/22 | 18.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 AS 1449/23 | 25.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 2922/23 | 22.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 SO 1954/21 | 07.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 87/23 | 22.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 17 KR 2190/22 KH | 30.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 246/23 NZB KH | 09.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 6 R 1167/14 | 01.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 335/17 | 22.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 1150/22 ER | 23.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 3. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 P 298/22 | 29.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 3. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 P 299/22 | 29.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 3. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 37 R 109/22 | 15.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 329/23 | 17.01.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 52/24 B NZB | 08.04.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. April 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 68 KR 30/21 | 08.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 578/22 | 07.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 3/24 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. April 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 13 SO 166/23 ER | 01.12.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 2. April 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 16 KR 626/23 ER | 09.01.2024 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 26/24 B ER | 26.03.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. April 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 SF 32/24 AB | 20.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 28. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 613/20 | 08.06.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 222/22 | 06.03.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 5 SB 239/20 | 28.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 197/22 | 21.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 182 BA 221/20 | 06.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 42/21 | 26.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 2 AS 1473/22 | 22.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 1473/22 | 15.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 252/23 BH | 06.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 2 As 1282/22 | 12.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 1257/22 | 15.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 251/23 BH | 06.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 2 AS 1035/22 | 14.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 1019/22 | 15.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 250/23 BH | 06.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 49 AS 777/22 | 27.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 791/22 | 15.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 249/23 BH | 06.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. März 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 61 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 61 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 61 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1500, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150594 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 183/16 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-183-16-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-183-16-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 730/14 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-730-14-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-730-14-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 74/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-74-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:58:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:58:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-74-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 R 412/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-r-412-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:58:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:58:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-r-412-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160157 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1916/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1916-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1916-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160154 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1217/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1217-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1217-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 2922/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-2922-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-2922-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160149 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 87/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-87-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-87-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 246/23 NZB KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-246-23-nzb-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-246-23-nzb-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 335/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-335-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-335-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143954 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 1150/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-1150-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-1150-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143950 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 P 298/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-p-298-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-p-298-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143947 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 P 299/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-p-299-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-p-299-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 329/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-329-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-329-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 578/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-578-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-578-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 SO 166/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-so-166-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-so-166-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130863 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 26/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-26-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-26-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143944 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 SF 32/24 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-sf-32-24-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-sf-32-24-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130862 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 222/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-222-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-222-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129467 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 197/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-197-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-197-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 42/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-42-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-42-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 1473/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-1473-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-1473-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 1257/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-1257-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-1257-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150574 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 1019/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-1019-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-1019-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 791/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-791-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-791-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150594 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-04-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-04-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 183/16 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-183-16-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:53:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:53:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-183-16-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => fd4711ac72fb86dc62b92061d2fe04ce [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0225b7f1fdb0c77222544927e7983b9b:0.32391100 1745344639 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.