| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 210 KR 1296/19 | 24.01.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 25. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 3 KR 2980/20 | 08.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 48/24 KH | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 25. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 22 KR 2605/20 | 13.12.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 25. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 4 SB 164/17 | 02.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 SB 123/22 | 29.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 25. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 44 AS 1760/19 | 15.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 137/22 ZVW | 25.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 25. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 21 AS 1991/20 | 30.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 6 AS 400/21 | 29.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 25. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 21 AS 1991/20 | 30.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 6 AS 400/21 | 29.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 25. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 38 R 244/17 | 17.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 1 R 61/19 | 25.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 25. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 38 R 244/17 | 17.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 1 R 61/19 | 25.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 25. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 26 AY 2/23 ER | 06.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 AY 14/23 B ER | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 25. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 2527/22 | 11.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 25. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 20 SO 238/18 | 31.08.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 25. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 20 SO 272/17 | 31.08.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 25. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 23 U 128/18 | 05.05.2022 | L 6 U 39/22 | 15.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 24 AS 1435/20 | 25.03.2022 | L 2 AS 230/22 | 06.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 19 AS 3330/15 | 01.03.2023 | L 2 AS 288/23 NZB | 14.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 24 AS 873/18 | 20.12.2023 | L 2 AS 27/24 B | 18.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 31 SO 38/20 | 13.11.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 38/20 | 01.11.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 2/24 R | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 21. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 17 AS 1634/23 ER | 09.02.2024 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 94/24 B | 13.03.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 21. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 13 VG 2/20 | 15.11.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 29/21 | 25.09.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 22 Ba 14/18 | 22.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 21/21 | 26.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 221 BA 16/21 | 24.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 77/21 | 23.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 127 AS 6028/21 | 09.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 1102/23 B PKH | 12.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 18 KR 242/19 | 18.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 165/21 | 27.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 43 KR 226/20 | 21.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 315/21 | 26.01.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 12/24 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. März 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 63 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 63 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 63 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1550, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150331 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 210 KR 1296/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-210-kr-1296-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-210-kr-1296-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140356 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 2980/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-2980-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-2980-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 KR 2605/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-kr-2605-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-kr-2605-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 123/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-123-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-123-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139379 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 137/22 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-137-22-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-137-22-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139374 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 400/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-400-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-400-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139373 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 400/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-400-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-400-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139369 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 61/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-61-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-61-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139368 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 61/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-61-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-61-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139363 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 14/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-14-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-14-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133346 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 2527/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-2527-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-2527-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132848 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 238/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-238-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-238-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 272/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-272-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-272-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161793 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 39/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-39-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-39-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 230/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-230-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-230-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161791 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 288/23 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-288-23-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-288-23-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 27/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-27-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-27-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 38/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-38-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-38-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 94/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-94-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-94-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VG 29/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vg-29-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vg-29-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129460 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 21/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-21-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-21-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129457 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 77/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-77-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-77-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129454 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 1102/23 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-1102-23-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-1102-23-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129451 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 165/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-165-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-165-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129449 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 315/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-315-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-315-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150331 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 210 KR 1296/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-210-kr-1296-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-210-kr-1296-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f7199806597eb36f58591d0c59ccffe8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:02541e962436c56023194243524ae2ba:0.50708600 1745360549 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.