| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 53 KR 341/17 | 23.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 42/20 | 25.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 KR 437/23 | 20.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 1336/23 | 24.01.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 3/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 14 KR 1282/20 | 03.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 1044/21 | 24.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 10 R 2439/22 | 29.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 1205/23 | 24.01.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 3/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 572/20 | 01.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 20. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 2 AS 669/17 | 08.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AS 181/21 | 25.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 16 AS 760/21 WA | 29.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 750/23 NZB | 19.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 115 U 237/18 | 08.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 26/20 | 15.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 16 AS 1549/19 WA | 29.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 734/23 NZB | 19.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 AS 650/17 | 20.08.2019 | L 2 AS 547/19 | 09.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 19. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 AS 3366/15 | 08.03.2018 | L 2 AS 328/18 | 09.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 19. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 7 AS 1166/21 | 18.07.2022 | L 2 AS 479/22 NZB | 29.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 19. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 32 AS 716/19 | 15.06.2021 | L 4 AS 396/21 | 05.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 19. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 32 AS 707/19 | 15.06.2021 | L 4 AS 395/21 | 05.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 19. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 947/22 | 09.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 947/22 | 06.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 9/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 27 AS 4820/19 | 09.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 AS 1072/22 | 17.01.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 52/23 C | 17.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 24 R 1439/20 | 28.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 780/21 | 16.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 48/23 AR | 26.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 KR 726/22 | 26.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 659/23 NZB | 14.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 6 R 551/19 | 03.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 1079/21 | 21.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 44 R 184/19 | 15.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 671/21 | 16.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 33 AS 138/20 | 03.09.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 268/23 | 04.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 6/24 R | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 19. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 33 AS 138/20 | 03.09.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 268/23 | 04.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 6/24 R | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 19. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 6 SO 12/18 | 16.10.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 19. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 1 U 270/16 | 26.09.2018 | - | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 19. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 2 R 8042/16 | 06.07.2017 | - | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 19. März 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 64 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 64 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 64 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1575, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129444 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 42/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-42-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-42-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 1336/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-1336-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-1336-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160143 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 1044/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-1044-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-1044-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160140 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 1205/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-1205-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-1205-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 89 KR 572/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-89-kr-572-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-89-kr-572-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129441 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 181/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-181-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-181-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 750/23 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-750-23-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-750-23-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129435 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 26/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-26-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-26-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129432 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 734/23 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-734-23-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-734-23-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161789 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 547/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-547-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-547-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161788 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 328/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-328-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-328-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161787 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 479/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-479-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-479-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161786 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 396/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-396-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-396-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161785 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 395/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-395-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-395-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 947/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-947-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-947-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150546 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1072/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1072-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1072-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150542 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 780/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-780-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-780-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150539 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 659/23 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-659-23-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-659-23-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150537 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 1079/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-1079-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-1079-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 671/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-671-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-671-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137330 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 AS 138/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-as-138-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-as-138-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137326 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 268/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-268-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-268-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131232 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 SO 12/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-so-12-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-so-12-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131229 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 270/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-270-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-270-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 8042/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-8042-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-8042-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129444 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 42/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-42-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-42-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3ab350e36814da447e2c23883c2c1f8a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:dbb7b61c78b8b537061e3c79f9236d2d:0.97230700 1745375313 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.