| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 69 R 1231/14 | 04.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 501/19 | 23.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 1 U 241/16 | 03.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 549/20 | 29.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 48 SO 570/13 | 06.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 7/16 | 23.03.2017 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 21 P 72/22 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 134/22 | 05.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 9 P 5/22 | 18.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 108/22 | 06.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 13/23 AR | 16.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KR 785/20 | 11.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 101/21 | 27.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 50 BA 47/20 | 03.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 55/23 | 20.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 79 R 261/20 | 30.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 R 156/23 | 24.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 36 AS 1607/19 | 20.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 395/21 | 24.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 319/23 ER | 11.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 18. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 11 R 887/18 | 18.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 R 310/20 | 18.08.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 18. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 120/05 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 3/19 | 08.03.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 18. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 48 KR 218/18 | 12.12.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Aurich | 18. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 22 AS 1813/17 | 20.11.2020 | L 4 AS 27/21 | 27.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 15. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 BA 15/18 | 30.11.2021 | L 3 BA 51/21 | 13.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 15. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 22 AS 195/18 | 20.11.2020 | L 4 AS 28/21 | 27.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 15. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KR 886/21 | 21.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 931/21 | 18.01.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 931/21 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 14 AS 399/19 | 13.07.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 8/24 | 28.02.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 15. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 13 P 93/23 ER | 18.12.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 P 5/24 B ER | 08.03.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 15. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 6 U 1012/16 | 16.10.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1380/19 | 14.12.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 15. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 10 U 360/19 | 20.01.2022 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 365/22 | 25.01.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 15. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 2906/14 | 20.02.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 360/17 | 15.12.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Meiningen | 15. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AL 485/19 | 06.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 2860/22 | 21.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 KR 1543/18 | 13.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 98/22 KH | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 11 KR 9/17 | 05.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 389/19 | 11.05.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. März 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 65 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 65 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 65 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 501/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-501-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-501-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150528 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 549/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-549-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-549-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150524 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 7/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-7-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-7-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150521 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 134/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-134-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-134-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 108/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-108-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-108-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150515 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 101/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-101-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-101-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139359 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 55/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-55-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-55-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 156/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-156-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-156-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139349 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 395/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-395-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-395-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137113 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 319/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-319-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-319-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 R 310/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-r-310-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-r-310-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134664 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 3/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-3-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-3-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71268 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 48 KR 218/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-48-kr-218-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:36:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:36:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-48-kr-218-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161784 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 27/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-27-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-27-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161783 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 51/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-51-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-51-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161782 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 28/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-28-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-28-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150512 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 931/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-931-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-931-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139471 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 8/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-8-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-8-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134977 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 P 5/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-p-5-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:28:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:28:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-p-5-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132270 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1380/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1380-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1380-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 365/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-365-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-365-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131021 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 360/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-360-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-360-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160137 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 2860/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-2860-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-2860-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150509 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 367/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-367-22-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-367-22-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150506 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 389/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-389-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-389-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 501/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-501-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-501-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1804f3579289dc0b014d87e0db284e5f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:92797e494b1532d2250b2cffd7acacc6:0.14084900 1745375146 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.