| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 33 KR 25/17 | 04.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 796/21 KH | 24.08.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 14. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 25 AS 394/14 | 05.07.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 139/19 | 23.02.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 14. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 25 AS 225/14 | 27.01.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 138/19 | 23.02.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 14. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 1 KR 464/19 | 27.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 186/20 | 24.08.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 2/24 R | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 14. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 9 SF 749/22 E | 02.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 14. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 17 AL 97/20 | 28.04.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 85/21 | 06.03.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 14. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 136/21 | 09.06.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 340/21 | 20.02.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 14. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 37 U 153/21 | 15.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 72/22 | 14.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 26/23 AR | 08.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 14 AS 692/23 B ER | 18.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 AS 207/23 B ER | 29.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 13. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 6 AL 106/22 | 27.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 13. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 12 AL 53/20 | 05.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 85/22 | 21.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 22 AS 1625/20 | 18.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 162/21 | 17.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 24/22 R | 13.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 32 AS 3591/18 | 26.01.2022 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 8/22 R | 20.09.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 15 RF 13/18 | 30.04.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 12. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 U 40/16 | 03.08.2017 | - | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 12. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 5 U 53/19 | 05.10.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 12. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 U 1060/20 | 21.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 2119/22 | 19.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 17 SB 3488/19 | 16.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 1277/22 | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 23 SB 284/18 | 29.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 5 SB 34/21 | 12.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 19 U 224/18 | 23.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 11. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 AL 221/21 | 02.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 2871/22 | 21.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 AS 2481/23 ER | 28.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 261/24 ER-B | 23.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 AS 612/21 | 29.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 2081/23 | 21.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 2392/19 | 24.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 134/22 | 19.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 13/24 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 1302/21 | 02.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 293/22 | 24.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. März 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 66 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 66 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 66 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144981 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 796/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-796-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-796-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134976 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 139/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-139-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:28:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:28:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-139-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134975 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 138/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-138-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:28:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:28:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-138-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134735 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 186/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-186-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-186-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SF 749/22 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-sf-749-22-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-sf-749-22-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130860 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 85/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-85-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-85-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130859 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 340/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-340-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-340-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150503 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 72/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-72-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-72-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Freizügigkeitsberechtigung nach Art. 10 EUV 492/2011 für Familienangehörige [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => freizuegigkeitsberechtigung-nach-art-10-euv-492-2011-fuer-familienangehoerige [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/freizuegigkeitsberechtigung-nach-art-10-euv-492-2011-fuer-familienangehoerige/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134857 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AL 106/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-al-106-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-al-106-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 85/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-85-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-85-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 24/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-24-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:19:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:19:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-24-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 8/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-8-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:19:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:19:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-8-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131224 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 RF 13/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-rf-13-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-rf-13-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131221 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 U 40/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-u-40-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-u-40-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 U 53/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-u-53-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-u-53-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 2119/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-2119-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-2119-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160131 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 1277/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-1277-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-1277-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139340 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SB 34/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sb-34-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sb-34-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131043 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 U 224/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-u-224-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-u-224-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160128 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 2871/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-2871-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-2871-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160125 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 261/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-261-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-261-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160122 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 2081/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-2081-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-2081-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129424 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 134/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-134-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-134-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KR 293/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kr-293-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kr-293-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144981 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 796/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-796-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-796-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 256e6202439e00e236a7ab80b08028d3 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6a4243f000e6c2fcb1d6ba20ee503fc1:0.32791600 1745415614 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.