| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 14 AS 2966/13 | 19.05.2017 | L 5 AS 264/20 | 25.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 4 AS 262/20 | 03.04.2023 | L 4 AS 190/23 | 05.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 22 AS 26/16 | 20.11.2020 | L 4 AS 29/21 | 27.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 10 SO 28/23 ER | 17.10.2023 | L 8 SO 59/23 B ER | 16.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. März 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 17 R 91/22 | 25.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 7. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 17 R 1137/21 | 25.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 7. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 45 VG 27/18 | 08.05.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 10/20 | 02.05.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 BA 20/23 ER | 13.10.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 BA 107/23 B ER | 26.02.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 10 AS 658/17 | 29.01.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 94/20 | 18.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 15/22 R | 13.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 5 AS 2769/21 | 06.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 592/23 | 04.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 KR 353/23 | 04.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2835/23 | 21.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 9 R 102/19 | 22.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 2126/21 | 23.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 4 KR 881/22 | 01.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 695/23 | 26.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 P 4150/21 | 11.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 2751/22 | 26.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 184 SO 102/20 | 30.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 243/20 | 21.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 19/22 R | 20.09.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 54 KR 88/17 | 09.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 292/21 | 19.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 6 R 34/18 | 20.09.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 240/21 | 18.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 31/24 B | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 5. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 22 BA 1033/20 | 22.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 BA 2385/22 | 25.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 3 KR 385/16 | 17.03.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 94/21 | 12.10.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 4. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 9 SO 19/19 | 08.01.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 19/19 | 13.12.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 4. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 16 KA 128/23 B ER | 17.11.2023 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 128/23 B ER | 25.01.2024 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 4. März 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 8 AS 256/14 | 07.12.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 26/19 | 05.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 187/23 BH | 08.12.2023 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 1. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 8 AS 256/14 | 07.12.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 26/19 | 05.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 187/23 BH | 08.12.2023 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 1. März 2024 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 11 BA 141/20 | 22.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 1. März 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 20 EG 7/22 | 28.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 1. März 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 67 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 67 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 67 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1650, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161781 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 264/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-264-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-264-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161780 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 190/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-190-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-190-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161779 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 29/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-29-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-29-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161778 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 59/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-59-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-59-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132262 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 R 91/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-r-91-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-r-91-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132257 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 R 1137/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-r-1137-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-r-1137-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130858 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VG 10/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vg-10-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vg-10-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130857 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 BA 107/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ba-107-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ba-107-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88055 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 15/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-15-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:19:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:19:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-15-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160119 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 592/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-592-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-592-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160116 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2835/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2835-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2835-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160114 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 2126/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-2126-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-2126-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160111 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 695/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-695-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-695-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 2751/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-2751-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-2751-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88054 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 19/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-19-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:19:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:19:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-19-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139335 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 292/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-292-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-292-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134974 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 240/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-240-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:28:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:28:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-240-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160105 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 2385/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-2385-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-2385-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150541 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 94/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-94-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-94-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150538 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 19/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-19-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-19-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150535 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 128/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-128-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-128-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 256/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-256-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-256-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150037 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 26/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-26-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-26-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143941 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 BA 141/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ba-141-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ba-141-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143938 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 EG 7/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-eg-7-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-eg-7-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161781 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 264/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-264-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-264-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => c3fc53352527dcaf63b69818c36d8cf4 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1388b68a144a78ec0a955dc774bf68a2:0.81240300 1745415613 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.