Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
- | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 57/18 | 12.12.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 1. März 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 13 KA 5/20 | 28.11.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 4/24 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 29. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 AS 114/22 | 14.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 29. Februar 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 12 U 37/18 | 10.12.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 79/20 | 27.07.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 15 AS 448/21 | 28.07.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 AS 382/22 | 13.12.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 30 KR 1174/19 | 06.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 674/23 | 06.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 7/24 BH | 02.07.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. Februar 2024 |
Sozialgericht Kiel | S 44 KR 658/19 | 06.07.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 166/20 | 24.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 32/22 R | 12.12.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Februar 2024 |
Sozialgericht Mainz | S 14 KR 35/18 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 224/19 | 03.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 22/22 R | 19.10.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Februar 2024 |
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 R 733/17 | 14.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 227/19 | 13.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 16/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. Februar 2024 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 174 AS 4184/23 | 17.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 147/24 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 27. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 52 AS 405/17 | 25.10.2018 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 27. Februar 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 5 AS 1012/23 | 19.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 27. Februar 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 33 AS 820/20 | 03.03.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 127/23 | 05.02.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 27. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Stade | S 50 BA 13/20 | 24.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 59/23 | 20.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 26. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Hannover | S 23 SB 284/18 | 29.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 5 SB 34/21 | 12.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 26. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 SB 248/22 | 03.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 2024/23 | 24.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 1654/23 | 27.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3301/23 B | 11.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 18 R 558/19 | 12.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 13/22 | 14.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 9 R 144/21 | 20.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 SF 249/23 | 27.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 9 144/21 | 20.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 SF 250/23 G | 27.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Februar 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 96/23 | 14.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 23. Februar 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 P 91/23 | 17.01.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 23. Februar 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Gießen | S 20 AL 72/23 | 19.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 23. Februar 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Münster | S 14 R 353/23 | 08.01.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 23. Februar 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Münster | S 14 R 392/22 | 08.01.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 23. Februar 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 68 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 68 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 68 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1675, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134660 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 57/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-57-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-57-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134855 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KA 5/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-ka-5-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-ka-5-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133715 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 114/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-114-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-114-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 79/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-79-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-79-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130855 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 AS 382/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-as-382-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-as-382-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150500 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 674/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-674-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-674-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88053 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 32/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-32-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:19:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:19:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-32-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 22/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-22-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:19:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:19:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-22-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150497 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 227/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-227-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-227-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 174 AS 4184/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-174-as-4184-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-174-as-4184-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 52 AS 405/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-52-as-405-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-52-as-405-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 1012/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-1012-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-1012-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 127/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-127-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-127-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 59/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-59-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-59-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139322 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SB 34/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sb-34-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sb-34-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160101 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 2024/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-2024-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-2024-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160098 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3301/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3301-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3301-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150493 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 13/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-13-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-13-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SF 249/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-sf-249-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-sf-249-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150488 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SF 250/23 G [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-sf-250-23-g [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-sf-250-23-g/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 96/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-96-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-96-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139466 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 P 91/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-p-91-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-p-91-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AL 72/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-al-72-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:28:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:28:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-al-72-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 R 353/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-r-353-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-r-353-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132833 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 R 392/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-r-392-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-r-392-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134660 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 57/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-57-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-57-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3db88f2b71df5a038940e29072b85635 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:ffbf7cedc7b64b21bdc285412c499295:0.70536400 1746211177 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.