| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 105/21 | 28.04.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 16/22 | 06.12.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 KR 319/19 | 27.09.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 430/22 | 30.01.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 68 U 5/17 | 21.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 156/22 | 17.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 174 AS 11746/19 | 12.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 320/21 | 17.01.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 11/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 127 AS 783/18 WA | 12.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AS 844/20 | 19.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 8 AS 206/16 | 26.10.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 17/19 | 24.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 13/22 R | 27.09.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 R 1367/20 | 12.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 3844/21 | 28.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 R 1400/21 | 21.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 3374/22 | 27.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 R 701/20 | 16.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 3106/21 | 15.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 R 639/21 | 20.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 2987/22 | 24.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 R 435/19 | 23.09.2022 | L 2 R 2935/22 | 29.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Februar 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SO 2119/21 | 14.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2755/23 WA | 06.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 6 R 3825/20 | 25.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 2477/22 | 15.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 SO 207/20 | 23.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1833/23 | 06.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 R 697/21 | 20.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 1756/23 | 06.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 AS 2024/21 | 08.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 1606/22 | 21.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 24 R 4615/18 | 12.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 1529/21 | 27.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 3 VE 4329/15 | 28.05.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 5 VE 920/19 | 21.09.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 21. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 33 AS 1201/19 | 03.03.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 125/23 | 05.02.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 20. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 33 AS 1201/19 | 03.03.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 125/23 | 05.02.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 20. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 20 R 1735/20 | 18.01.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 20. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 20 R 1313/20 | 26.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 20. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 20 R 28/20 | 18.01.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 20. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 19 AS 706/20 | 21.12.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 20. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 R 1645/18 ZV zuvor S 2 RS 30/15 zuvor S 16 RS 30/15 | 08.08.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 402/23 ZV | 08.02.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Februar 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 69 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 69 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 69 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1700, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130854 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 16/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-16-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-16-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130853 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 430/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-430-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-430-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129418 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 156/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-156-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-156-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129415 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 320/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-320-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-320-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129412 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 844/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-844-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-844-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 13/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-13-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:19:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:19:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-13-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160095 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 3844/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-3844-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-3844-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160093 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 3374/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-3374-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-3374-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160090 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 3106/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-3106-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-3106-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 2987/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-2987-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-2987-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160084 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 2935/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-2935-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-2935-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160081 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2755/23 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2755-23-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2755-23-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 2477/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-2477-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-2477-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160074 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1833/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1833-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1833-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160071 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 1756/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-1756-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-1756-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1606/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1606-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1606-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 1529/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-1529-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-1529-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131423 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 VE 920/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ve-920-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ve-920-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137100 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 AS 1201/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-as-1201-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-as-1201-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137095 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 125/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-125-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-125-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132062 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 R 1735/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-r-1735-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-r-1735-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 R 1313/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-r-1313-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-r-1313-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 R 28/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-r-28-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-r-28-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 706/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-706-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-706-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161469 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 402/23 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-402-23-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-402-23-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130854 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 16/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-16-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-16-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d93937d0e3f48d1bbe544897363b13fe [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c5772ef772d04866e46a1363dddecff8:0.49733300 1746247549 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.