| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 56 SF 89/23 E | 12.09.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 153/23 | 07.02.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 40 U 577/21 | 12.01.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 184/23 | 07.02.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 46 KR 65/15 | 18.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16/4 KR 548/19 | 13.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 2/23 R | 30.11.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 16 AS 3753/16 | 04.07.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 834/17 | 29.08.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 21 AS 1885/18 | 08.09.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AS 537/22 | 15.12.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 21 AS 851/19 | 05.08.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AS 797/20 | 15.12.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 30 SF 148/22 E | 26.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 47/23 B | 28.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 48 R 1845/16 | 07.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 222/18 | 22.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 5 KR 947/16 | 17.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 496/20 | 18.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 43 KR 1367/16 | 31.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 357/22 KH | 01.02.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 8/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 33 KR 229/19 | 12.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 785/22 | 23.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 R 890/18 | 02.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 656/19 | 07.06.0223 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 14 KR 45/23 ER | 22.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 357/23 B ER | 09.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 5 AS 3199/23 ER | 08.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 1758/23 B ER | 22.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 52/19 | 16.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 170/21 | 28.09.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 14. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 5 R 1405/14 | 25.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 208/18 | 14.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 40/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 33 AS 337/23 ER | 17.10.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 413/23 B ER | 06.02.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 13. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 U 1682/23 | 08.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 13. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 9 AS 1488/18 | 26.04.2021 | L 2 AS 416/21 | 31.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 12. Februar 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 8 R 542/19 | 22.06.2021 | L 3 R 184/21 | 24.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 12. Februar 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 11 AS 1210/19 - PK | 20.04.2020 | L 2 AS 211/20 B | 04.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 12. Februar 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 EG 9/21 | 31.01.2023 | L 2 EG 1/23 | 20.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 12. Februar 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 23 U 70/19 | 18.06.2020 | L 6 U 51/20 | 19.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 12. Februar 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 58 U 97/20 | 29.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 U 157/20 | 22.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 12. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 34/17 | 13.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 12/21 | 29.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 12. Februar 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 71 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 71 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 71 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 153/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-153-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-153-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 184/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-184-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-184-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 2/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-2-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-2-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161467 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 834/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-834-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-834-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161465 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 537/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-537-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-537-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161462 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 797/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-797-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-797-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150453 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 47/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-47-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-47-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150450 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 222/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-222-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-222-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150449 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 496/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-496-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-496-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150445 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 357/22 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-357-22-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-357-22-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150442 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 785/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-785-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:51:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:51:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-785-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150440 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 656/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-656-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-656-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150437 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 357/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-357-23-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-357-23-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150434 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1758/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1758-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1758-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144947 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 170/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-170-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-170-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150432 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 208/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-208-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-208-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137081 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 413/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-413-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-413-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 1682/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-1682-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-1682-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161774 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 416/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-416-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-416-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161773 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 184/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-184-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-184-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161772 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 211/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-211-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:56:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:56:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-211-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161771 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 EG 1/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-eg-1-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-eg-1-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161770 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 51/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-51-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-51-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139317 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 157/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-157-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-157-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139312 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 12/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-12-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-12-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 153/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-153-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-153-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a323827fcdb2792075b7b5f88ddf648e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:eecdc61a85102b5218410f59ecb6fb2b:0.57378000 1746294315 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.