| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 116 AS 1872/21 | 03.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 316/22 | 29.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 1321/21 | 25.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 145/22 | 12.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 43 AS 3851/18 | 04.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 1101/22 | 19.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 101/18 | 29.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 29/20 | 20.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 22 KA 29/17 | 02.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 24/21 | 06.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 KR 2833/18 | 05.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2777/22 | 24.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 24 R 1396/20 | 26.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 1702/21 | 24.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 2824/22 | 09.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 431/23 | 24.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 7 KR 2604/18 | 24.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 177/22 | 24.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 KR 3231/20 | 28.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3288/21 | 21.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 6 KR 3243/18 | 09.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1032/20 | 21.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 2 KR 578/22 | 26.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3534/22 | 21.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 30 KR 1356/22 KH | 12.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 7. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 48 R 286/17 | 23.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 33 R 893/20 | 08.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 12 AL 36/23 ER | 31.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 61/23 B ER | 17.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 BA 32/22 ER | 22.12.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 BA 5/23 B ER | 27.11.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 2 KA 19/19 | 25.05.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 5/22 | 21.11.2023 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 26 R 532/10 | 14.11.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 762/15 | 20.02.2017 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 2085/21 | 07.12.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 6. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 1642/22 | 07.12.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 6. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 37 AS 4013/23 ER | 13.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 152/23 B ER | 22.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 34/17 | 13.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 12/21 | 29.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 19 U 224/18 | 23.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 6 U 69/22 | 14.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 88 KR 1796/19 | 31.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 196/23 | 19.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 6. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 7 BA 108/20 | 08.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 BA 3136/20 | 20.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 9/21 R | 24.10.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 73 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 73 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 73 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1800, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129393 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 316/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-316-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-316-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129390 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 145/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-145-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-145-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129388 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 1101/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-1101-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-1101-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 29/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-29-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-29-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 24/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-24-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-24-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2777/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2777-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2777-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160050 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 1702/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-1702-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-1702-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 431/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-431-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-431-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160043 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 177/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-177-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-177-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160040 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3288/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3288-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3288-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1032/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1032-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1032-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160035 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3534/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3534-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3534-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144980 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 KR 1356/22 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-kr-1356-22-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-kr-1356-22-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 33 R 893/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-33-r-893-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-33-r-893-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129375 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 61/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-61-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-61-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161460 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 5/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-5-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-5-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 5/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-5-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-5-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 762/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-762-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-762-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144979 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 2085/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-2085-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-2085-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144978 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 1642/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-1642-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-1642-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139273 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 152/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-152-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-152-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139268 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 12/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-12-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-12-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139263 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 69/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-69-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-69-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139258 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 196/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-196-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-196-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 9/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-9-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-9-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129393 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 316/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-316-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-316-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1849e5ebc6a82bc942e8db3e9415cfe9 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6c6b6ce80831899584596d83125522c7:0.05933200 1746483851 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.