| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 19 AS 1430/16 | 11.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 1867/20 | 03.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 17/22 R | 27.09.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 10/21 | 27.07.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 35/21 | 14.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 26/22 R | 25.10.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 9 KR 3024/16 | 15.02.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 421/18 | 26.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 25/22 R | 29.08.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 48 KR 658/23 ER | 13.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 502/23 B ER | 27.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 2 KR 1673/16 | 02.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 386/21 | 09.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 35 AS 704/19 | 17.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 412/21 | 27.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 16 KR 260/19 | 27.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 301/22 | 10.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 16 AS 47/21 | 17.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 5. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 5 P 89/22 | 28.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 5. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 11KR 503/20 | 24.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 127/23 | 17.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 413/21 | 20.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Februar 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 12 AL 1852/23 ER | 11.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 2913/23 ER-B | 20.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 R 759/20 | 24.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 1779/22 | 17.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 BA 161/20 | 27.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 BA 1926/22 | 17.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 8 U 435/22 | 28.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 3164/22 | 17.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 25 KR 298/21 | 15.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 2. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 274/23 ER | 28.08.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 1. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 266/23 ER | 08.08.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 1. Februar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 101/19 | 23.06.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 393/21 | 04.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 137/22 B | 04.12.2023 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 101/19 | 23.06.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 393/21 | 04.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 137/22 B | 04.12.2023 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 6 R 142/18 | 23.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 314/20 | 28.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 81/23 B | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 6 R 142/18 | 23.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 314/20 | 28.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 81/23 B | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. Februar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 VG 6/13 | 09.10.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 43/14 | 07.03.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Februar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 KR 262/17 | 16.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 3774/19 | 23.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 R 2778/19 | 13.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 2627/20 | 12.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31. Januar 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 74 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 74 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 74 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1825, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88041 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 17/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-17-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-17-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88040 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 26/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-26-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-26-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88039 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 25/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-25-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-25-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139254 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 502/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-502-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-502-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139249 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 386/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-386-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-386-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 412/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-412-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-412-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 301/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-301-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-301-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131040 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 47/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-47-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-47-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130942 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 P 89/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-p-89-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-p-89-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 127/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-127-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-127-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129369 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KR 413/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kr-413-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kr-413-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160032 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 2913/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-2913-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-2913-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160029 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 1779/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-1779-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-1779-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160025 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 1926/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-1926-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-1926-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 3164/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-3164-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-3164-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 298/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-298-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-298-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 SO 274/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-so-274-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-so-274-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143928 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 SO 266/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-so-266-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-so-266-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137061 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AS 101/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-as-101-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-as-101-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 393/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-393-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-393-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137048 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 142/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-142-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-142-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137045 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 314/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-314-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-314-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130848 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VG 43/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vg-43-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vg-43-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 3774/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-3774-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-3774-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 2627/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-2627-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-2627-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88041 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 17/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-17-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-17-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 5dc5480d8f1e86c4dbd16d40a784a901 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:75ffb7b284d977c53e4806ddddf51764:0.85357100 1746514495 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.