| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 1 AS 83/23 ER | 19.10.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 397/23 B ER | 08.01.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 18. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 28 KR 193/15 | 28.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 BA 15/18 | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 28 KR 193/15 | 28.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 BA 15/18 | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 4 AL 78/19 | 16.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AL 99/21 | 07.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 24 AS 110/22 | 28.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 9 AS 637/22 | 26.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 218/17 | 23.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 59/19 | 25.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 18. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 1 AS 731/21 | 21.06.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 305/23 | 13.12.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 18. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 BA 23/23 | 11.01.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 18. Januar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 20 EG 15/19 FG | 12.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 15/21 FG | 19.12.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Januar 2024 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 166/22 KL | 29.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Januar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 202 AS 2224/17 | 22.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AS 1273/20 | 18.10.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 2/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Januar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 25 U 148/18 | 09.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 222/21 | 22.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 BA 266/18 | 23.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 BA 83/19 | 18.10.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 54/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Januar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 17 U 722/19 | 07.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3148/21 | 14.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 14 U 3697/18 | 23.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1430/20 | 14.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 U 2650/19 | 12.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1892/21 | 14.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 R 568/20 | 30.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 349/22 | 28.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 SF 1772/23 E | 13.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 2707/23 E-B | 29.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 U 4087/17 | 06.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2177/19 | 16.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 7 U 3608/17 | 18.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1221/20 | 16.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 9 R 2514/19 | 26.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 3772/20 | 16.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 28/17 | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 32/21 | 25.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 17. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 41 R 384/19 | 03.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 R 105/23 | 08.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 17. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 6 U 27/23 | 11.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 U 27/23 | 11.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 17. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 11 KR 310/14 | 26.02.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 BA 44/18 | 27.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 8/21 R | 20.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Januar 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 77 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 77 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 77 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 397/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-397-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-397-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139234 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 BA 15/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ba-15-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ba-15-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139233 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 BA 15/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ba-15-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ba-15-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139229 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AL 99/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-al-99-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-al-99-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139224 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 637/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-637-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-637-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 59/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-59-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-59-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 305/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-305-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-305-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133713 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 BA 23/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-ba-23-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-ba-23-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 15/21 FG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-15-21-fg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-15-21-fg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 166/22 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-166-22-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-166-22-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129350 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 1273/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-1273-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-1273-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129347 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 222/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-222-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-222-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129343 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 83/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-83-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-83-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159971 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3148/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3148-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3148-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159968 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1430/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1430-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1430-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159964 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1892/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1892-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1892-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159961 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 349/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-349-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-349-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 2707/23 E-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-2707-23-e-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-2707-23-e-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159955 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2177/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2177-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2177-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159952 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1221/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1221-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1221-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159949 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 3772/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-3772-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-3772-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 32/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-32-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-32-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139207 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 105/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-105-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-105-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Versicherungsschutz beim Tanken während einer dienstlichen Fahrt [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => versicherungsschutz-beim-tanken-waehrend-einer-dienstlichen-fahrt [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/versicherungsschutz-beim-tanken-waehrend-einer-dienstlichen-fahrt/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88036 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 8/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-8-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-8-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 397/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-397-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-397-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4e8087487786b640e43583814167283e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:f195ae24751262354dcb54dbc45bee27:0.93985300 1746528008 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.