| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 21 SO 202/18 | 05.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Oldenburg | 15. Januar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 R 967/20 | 07.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 586/21 | 16.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 16 R 3680/20 | 20.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 2512/23 | 16.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 KR 1458/22 | 20.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 2052/23 | 13.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 KR 2984/21 | 10.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 3223/22 | 13.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 KR 2541/19 | 30.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 3231/21 | 13.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 45 EG 9/22 | 22.08.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 12. Januar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 6 SO 103/20 | 12.09.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 271/22 | 22.11.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 42 AY 69/23 ER | 07.11.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 45/23 B ER | 20.12.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 26 EG 2/21 | 17.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 EG 1/22 | 02.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 3/23 R | 26.10.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 R 1651/17 | 20.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 120/18 | 02.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 5/23 R | 18.10.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2024 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 28/21 KL | 21.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 A 1/23 R | 30.08.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 2 KR 1919/20 | 03.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1019/23 | 24.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 SO 2405/21 | 17.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3406/22 | 11.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 U 1026/20 | 15.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 865/22 | 13.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 SB 2176/22 | 02.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 2883/23 B | 07.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 22 BA 86/20 | 07.12.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 9/22 | 14.12.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 9. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 987/18 | 26.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 140/22 | 22.11.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 9. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 10 AS 630/23 ER | 26.09.2023 | L 2 AS 302/23 B ER | 24.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 8. Januar 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 2621/20 | 19.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 3073/21 | 18.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 20 EG 15/19 FG | 12.10.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 8. Januar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 24 AS 110/22 | 28.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 9 AS 637/22 | 26.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 4 R 132/18 | 19.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 R 239/22 | 06.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 34 BA 21/20 | 26.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 56/23 | 09.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 15 AS 428/20 | 24.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 74/23 | 27.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Januar 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 79 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 79 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 79 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1950, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71273 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 SO 202/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-so-202-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:36:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:36:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-so-202-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 586/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-586-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-586-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159943 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 2512/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-2512-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-2512-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159940 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 2052/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-2052-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-2052-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 3223/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-3223-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-3223-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159934 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 3231/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-3231-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:15:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:15:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-3231-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 45 EG 9/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-45-eg-9-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-45-eg-9-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 271/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-271-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-271-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 45/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-45-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-45-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88026 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 3/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-3-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-3-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88025 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 5/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-5-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-5-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 A 1/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-a-1-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-a-1-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159931 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1019/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1019-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1019-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159928 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3406/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3406-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3406-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159925 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 865/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-865-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-865-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159923 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 2883/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-2883-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-2883-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137319 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 9/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-9-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-9-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 140/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-140-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-140-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161769 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 302/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-302-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-302-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159920 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 3073/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-3073-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-3073-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 EG 15/19 FG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-eg-15-19-fg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-eg-15-19-fg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139168 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 637/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-637-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-637-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 239/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-239-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-239-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139158 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 56/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-56-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-56-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139153 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 74/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-74-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-74-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71273 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 SO 202/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-so-202-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:36:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:36:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-so-202-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8e2debb12a3c933a456add2371b7ec91 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:690bd860f578c1d582ebd0742aa63631:0.83140600 1746542364 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.