| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 13 BA 8/24 | 01.10.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 22. November 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 R 2584/18 | 09.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3242/21 | 10.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 72 R 1976/19 | 20.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 R 678/22 | 21.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 19 AS 1392/24 ER | 02.08.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1115/24 B ER | 22.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 1 KR 2/20 | 07.11.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 808/21 KH | 25.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. November 2024 | ||
| S 10 R 442/17 | 23.04.2021 | L 3 R 431/21 | 06.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. November 2024 | ||||
| S 4 R 744/17 | 08.11.2022 | L 3 R 53/23 | 21.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. November 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 40 SB 842/19 | 24.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 57/22 | 26.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 16 AY 119/23 ER | 26.06.2024 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AY 13/24 B ER | 11.11.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 21. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 16 AY 119/23 ER | 26.06.2024 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AY 13/24 B ER | 11.11.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 21. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 2 SO 29/24 ER | 04.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 100/24 B ER | 30.10.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 21. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 46 AS 3844/17 | 26.09.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 1212/19 | 24.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 10/23 R | 17.07.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. November 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 40 AS 2832/17 | 11.11.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 1428/19 | 08.02.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 7/23 R | 17.07.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. November 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 11 R 4014/18 | 14.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 1186/19 | 28.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 14/22 R | 27.06.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. November 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 14 R 773/21 | 25.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1060/24 | 26.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 R 737/24 | 16.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 590/24 | 26.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 KA 7076/16 | 22.11.2019 | L 5 KA 857/20 | 17.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. November 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 KR 2424/20 | 26.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 3595/22 | 30.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 15 KR 2800/22 | 20.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2942/23 | 14.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 20. November 2024 | ||
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 3 SF 636/24 | 15.11.2024 | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 20. November 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AS 442/24 | - | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 20. November 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 2 SO 143/21 | 06.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 16/22 | 19.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 17 KR 1688/21 | 14.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 660/23 | 06.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 12 AL 161/20 | 22.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AL 201/22 | 13.05.0024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. November 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 48 AY 21/24 ER | 31.07.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AY 16/24 B ER | 08.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. November 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 8 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 8 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 8 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 175, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 BA 8/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-ba-8-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-ba-8-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3242/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3242-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:33:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:33:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3242-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 R 678/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-r-678-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-r-678-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1115/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1115-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1115-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 808/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-808-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-808-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 431/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-431-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-431-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151014 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 53/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-53-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-53-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151013 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 57/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-57-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-57-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137281 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AY 119/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-ay-119-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-ay-119-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137276 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AY 13/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ay-13-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ay-13-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133770 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 100/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-100-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-100-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88174 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 10/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-10-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-10-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88173 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 7/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-7-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-7-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88172 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 14/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-14-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-14-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161149 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1060/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1060-24-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:33:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:33:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1060-24-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161147 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 590/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-590-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:33:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:33:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-590-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161145 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 857/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-857-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:33:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:33:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-857-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161143 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 3595/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-3595-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:33:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:33:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-3595-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161141 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2942/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2942-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:33:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:33:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2942-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151005 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SF 636/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sf-636-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sf-636-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 442/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-442-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-442-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 16/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-16-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-16-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 660/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-660-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-660-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151010 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AL 201/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-al-201-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-al-201-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151009 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AY 16/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-ay-16-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-ay-16-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 BA 8/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-ba-8-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-ba-8-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4b638ca4e20a1ca89391dac02548ab50 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.