| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 31 R 88/18 | 04.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 R 89/20 | 22.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 36 U 104/19 | 23.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 U 151/20 | 27.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 24 KA 88/18 | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 30/21 | 23.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 46 KR 59/22 | 22.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 8. Januar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 308/22 | 13.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Hannover | 8. Januar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 4 R 438/18 | 02.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 284/21 | 13.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 118/23 B | 28.11.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 5. Januar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 7 R 395/18 ZV | 28.11.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 555/22 ZV | 14.12.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 16 AS 5407/16 | 22.08.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 870/18 | 14.12.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 16 AS 1448/16 | 22.08.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 869/18 | 14.12.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 9 R 257/21 | 13.09.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 300/22 | 24.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 100/23 B | 27.10.2023 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 3. Januar 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 10 R 70/19 | 16.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 228/23 | 08.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 7 SO 150/17 | 27.01.2021 | L 8 SO 12/21 | 28.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 2. Januar 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 8 P 32/21 | 05.09.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 P 34/23 NZB | 13.12.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 2. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 9 AS 753/21 | 12.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. Januar 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 34 KR 28/21 | 15.09.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 61/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. Januar 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 5 AS 2289/18 | 11.06.2021 | L 5 AS 440/21 | 26.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 18 AS 2669/17 | 09.08.2019 | L 5 AS 97/23 | 16.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 6 AS 907/23 ER | 20.11.2023 | L 5 AS 356/23 B ER | 14.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 2 AL 94/23 ER | 18.08.2023 | L 2 AL 22/23 B ER | 06.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 28 AS 1022/22 | 29.09.2023 | L 2 AS 337/23 NZB | 15.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 7 U 76/16 | 20.02.2020 | L 6 U 25/20 | 15.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 R 3027/21 | 17.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 1001/22 | 21.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 R 1656/20 | 02.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 1154/22 | 28.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 19 P 655/17 | 30.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 1914/19 | 18.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 BA 1443/18 | 18.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 BA 2237/21 | 18.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Dezember 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 80 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 80 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 80 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1975, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139148 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 R 89/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-r-89-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-r-89-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139144 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 151/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-151-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-151-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 30/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-30-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-30-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131034 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 KR 59/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-kr-59-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-kr-59-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KA 308/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ka-308-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ka-308-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137310 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 284/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-284-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-284-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161441 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 555/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-555-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-555-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161439 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 870/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-870-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-870-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161436 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 869/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-869-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-869-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139456 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 R 257/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-r-257-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-r-257-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129333 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 R 228/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-r-228-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-r-228-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161768 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 12/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-12-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-12-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139453 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 P 34/23 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-p-34-23-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-p-34-23-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137306 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 753/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-753-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-753-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137302 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 KR 28/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-kr-28-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-kr-28-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161767 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 440/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-440-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-440-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161766 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 97/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-97-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-97-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161765 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 356/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-356-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-356-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 22/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-22-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-22-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 337/23 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-337-23-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-337-23-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161762 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 25/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-25-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-25-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 1001/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-1001-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-1001-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 1154/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-1154-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-1154-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 1914/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-1914-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-1914-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159909 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 2237/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-2237-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-2237-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139148 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-01-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-01-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 R 89/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-r-89-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-r-89-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => eada0ea06835cc2e90f2d37c84602043 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6bdc1f92476b389b7e3a9f9b377e9ea4:0.75549000 1746557635 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.