| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 AY 2202/20 | 04.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AY 3594/21 | 19.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 131/22 | 13.12.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 28. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 27 SO 1024/23 ER | 17.08.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 84/23 B ER | 12.12.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 28. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 11 SO 184/17 | 26.08.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 28. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 6 U 876/20 | 13.07.2022 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 708/22 | 19.10.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 28. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 SO 2192/20 | 23.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 1760/21 | 19.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 SO 3514/20 | 15.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 843/23 | 06.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 125/22 | 15.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1092/23 | 27.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 SO 967/20 | 17.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 3211/21 | 18.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 R 1410/21 | 19.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 3048/22 | 15.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 R 369/20 | 02.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 74/21 | 15.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 1 U 1897/19 | 02.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2477/20 | 20.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 U 3061/18 | 20.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 677/20 | 20.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 97/23 | 24.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 22. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 SF 209/23 AB | 14.12.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 22. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 11 SO 78/18 | 02.12.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 21. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 11 SO 30/17 | 23.09.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 21. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 11 SO 28/27 | 26.08.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 21. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 38 R 63/17 | 31.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 1 BA 54/18 | 18.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 4/22 R | 20.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 KR 1138/17 | 12.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3009/18 | 15.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 6/22 R | 21.09.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Dezember 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 9 R 257/21 | 13.09.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 300/22 | 24.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 100/23 B | 27.10.2023 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 15. Dezember 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KR 1576/16 | 22.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 KR 111/19 | 22.11.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 17/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Dezember 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 25 R 481/21 | 07.09.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 303/22 | 09.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 109/23 B | 07.11.2023 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 14. Dezember 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 25 R 481/21 | 07.09.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 303/22 | 09.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 109/23 B | 07.11.2023 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 14. Dezember 2023 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 48 SO 563/16 | 08.04.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 119/20 | 16.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 15/22 R | 13.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Dezember 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 81 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 81 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 81 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2000, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AY 3594/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ay-3594-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ay-3594-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150000 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 131/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-131-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-131-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 84/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-84-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-84-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 SO 184/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-so-184-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-so-184-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132255 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 708/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-708-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-708-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159903 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 1760/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-1760-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-1760-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 843/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-843-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-843-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159897 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1092/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1092-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1092-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159894 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 3211/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-3211-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-3211-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159891 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 3048/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-3048-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-3048-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159888 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 74/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-74-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-74-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159885 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2477/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2477-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2477-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 677/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-677-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-677-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 SO 97/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-so-97-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-so-97-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143913 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 SF 209/23 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-sf-209-23-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-sf-209-23-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 SO 78/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-so-78-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-so-78-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 SO 30/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-so-30-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-so-30-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132813 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 SO 38/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-so-38-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-so-38-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88023 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 BA 4/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-ba-4-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-ba-4-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 6/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-6-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-6-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139449 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 300/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-300-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-300-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129331 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 111/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-111-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-111-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 R 481/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-r-481-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-r-481-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 303/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-303-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-303-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88021 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 15/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-15-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-15-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AY 3594/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ay-3594-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ay-3594-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 6e084c1343cceb6ed6edb421e00aa959 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:f3d99242b18dfcd33a32261b9995847a:0.10087700 1746557315 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.