| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KR 499/21 | 05.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KR 546/21 | 08.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 9/22 R | 21.09.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Dezember 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 6 AS 336/21 | 12.08.2021 | L 4 AS 524/21 B | 16.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 13. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 AL 2410/21 | 21.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 13. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AY 2765/23 ER | 06.12.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 13. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 16 AL 196/21 | 20.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 13. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 2 SB 261/07 B | 06.04.2011 | L 7 SB 29/11 B | 30.06.2011 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 12. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 4 AL 764/06 | 22.09.2008 | L 2 AL 84/08 | 24.11.2011 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 12. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 SO 90/18 | 03.11.2021 | L 8 SO 46/21 | 28.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 12. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 AS 889/22 | 08.07.2022 | L 2 AS 131/23 B | 16.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 12. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 21 SB 194/18 K | 07.02.2023 | L 7 SB 17/23 B | 21.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 12. Dezember 2023 | |||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 24 SV 5/23 ER | 28.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 350/23 B ER | 23.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 12. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 41 SO 484/20 | 19.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 136/22 | 17.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 12. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 306/23 ER | 11.12.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 12. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 11/19 | 23.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 12. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 10 U 588/19 | 10.06.2022 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 631/22 | 19.10.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 12. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 11 AS 497/19 | 17.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 11. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 BA 2331/21 | 13.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 BA 2235/22 | 19.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 11 SB 10/20 | 16.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 3878/21 | 20.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 KR 3064/18 | 29.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1248/21 | 20.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 U 1983/20 | 17.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 1005/22 | 24.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 U 1642/20 | 25.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 2221/21 | 02.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Dezember 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 20 KA 103/22 | 27.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 8. Dezember 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 19 AS 520/21 | 04.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 572/21 | 16.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 191/22 BH | 23.06.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 7. Dezember 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 19 AS 520/21 | 04.11.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 572/21 | 16.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 191/22 BH | 23.06.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 7. Dezember 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 U 2930/18 | 09.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 1553/20 | 02.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Dezember 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 82 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 82 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 82 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2025, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 9/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-9-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-9-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161761 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 524/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-524-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-524-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 AL 2410/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-al-2410-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-al-2410-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140135 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AY 2765/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ay-2765-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ay-2765-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AL 196/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-al-196-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-al-196-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161760 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SB 29/11 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-sb-29-11-b-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-sb-29-11-b-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161759 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 84/08 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-84-08-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-84-08-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 46/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-46-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-46-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161757 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 131/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-131-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-131-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161756 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SB 17/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-sb-17-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:55:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:55:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-sb-17-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150333 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 350/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-350-23-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-350-23-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150329 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 136/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-136-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-136-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149996 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 306/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-306-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-306-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 11/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-11-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-11-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 631/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-631-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-631-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 497/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-497-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-497-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159879 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 2235/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-2235-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-2235-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 3878/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-3878-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-3878-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1248/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1248-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1248-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1005/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1005-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1005-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159868 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 2221/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-2221-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-2221-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KA 103/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ka-103-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ka-103-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137295 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 520/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-520-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-520-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137291 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 572/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-572-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-572-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1553/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1553-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:14:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:14:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1553-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 9/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-9-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-9-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => aac23c772e0a7f2caad644f01c940cd4 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9bbe8019ec82f543e810f8b71f12c031:0.29323500 1746572305 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.