Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 163 U 119/16 | 25.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 U 150/19 | 09.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 19 SB 67/21 | 20.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 142/22 | 09.11.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 37/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Dezember 2023 |
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 346/18 | 19.12.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 40/19 | 15.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 11/22 R | 21.09.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. Dezember 2023 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 17 R 2252/17 | 13.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 647/18 | 23.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 25/21 R | 26.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. Dezember 2023 |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 219/18 | 29.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 868/18 | 09.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 4/22 R | 21.09.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. Dezember 2023 |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 46 KR 3366/19 | 27.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 18/22 | 31.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 26/22 R | 29.08.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. Dezember 2023 |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 6 KR 193/16 | 23.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 60/21 | 23.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 18/22 R | 29.08.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. Dezember 2023 |
Sozialgericht Speyer | S 7 KR 1103/19 | 25.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 221/21 | 24.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 13/22 R | 29.08.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. Dezember 2023 |
Sozialgericht München | S 33 U 403/20 | 29.09.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 4. Dezember 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Bremen | S 36 AS 815/23 ER | 10.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 185/23 B ER | 13.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 4. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 R 533/21 | 08.08.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 377/23 B | 15.11.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 2 AS 2773/15 | 25.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 1199/19 | 19.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 132 SB 1497/16 | 26.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 102/19 | 31.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 7 U 2921/19 | 17.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 117/22 | 19.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 R 2048/19 | 06.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 3923/20 | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 12 R 4168/18 | 18.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 2020/21 | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 AL 705/21 | 15.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 1106/22 | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 R 2857/20 | 11.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1062/22 | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 17 R 2506/21 | 13.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 782/23 | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 R 1258/18 | 04.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 671/21 | 25.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 7 U 980/21 | 24.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3873/21 | 22.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 212 SO 1435/22 ER | 19.01.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 1. Dezember 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 SO 27/21 | 16.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 180/21 | 18.10.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 1. Dezember 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 SO 50/19 | 19.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 182/21 | 18.10.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 25/23 AR | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 1. Dezember 2023 |
Sozialgericht Hannover | S 24 KA 88/18 | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 30/21 | 23.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 1. Dezember 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 84 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 84 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 84 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2075, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129293 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 U 150/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-u-150-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-u-150-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 142/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-142-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-142-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88019 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 11/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-11-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-11-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 25/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-25-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-25-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 4/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-4-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-4-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 26/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-26-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-26-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 18/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-18-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-18-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88014 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 13/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-13-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:18:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:18:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-13-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143903 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 U 403/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-u-403-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-u-403-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139128 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 185/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-185-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-185-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130840 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 377/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-377-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-377-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AS 1199/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-as-1199-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-as-1199-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 102/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-102-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-102-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 117/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-117-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:13:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:13:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-117-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 3923/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-3923-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:13:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:13:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-3923-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 2020/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-2020-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:13:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:13:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-2020-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159825 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 1106/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-1106-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:13:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:13:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-1106-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1062/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1062-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:13:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:13:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1062-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 782/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-782-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:13:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:13:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-782-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159817 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 671/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-671-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:13:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:13:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-671-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159814 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3873/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3873-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:13:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:13:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3873-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150320 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 212 SO 1435/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-212-so-1435-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-212-so-1435-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139445 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SO 27/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-so-27-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-so-27-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139440 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SO 50/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-so-50-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-so-50-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139123 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 30/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-30-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-30-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129293 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 U 150/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-u-150-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:49:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:49:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-u-150-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => ed4442dddcb2dbb1ca847452509fda57 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:630396705ef90d03d864d452af4d917c:0.55792700 1746614524 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.