| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 53 AS 769/23 ER | 06.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 845/23 B ER | 05.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 40 AS 1534/21 | 11.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1232/22 B | 10.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. November 2023 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 37/23 KL | 06.06.2023 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 24 SV 5/23 ER | 28.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 350/23 B ER | 23.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 9 KR 251/19 | 10.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 739/22 | 06.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 56 BA 38/18 | 24.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 132/19 | 15.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 KR 3141/19 | 25.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 281/21 KH | 18.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 2 AS 2625/22 ER | 18.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 98/23 B ER L 7 AS 99/23 B | 10.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 767/23 | 21.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 28. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 59 KR 547/22 | 18.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 28. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 AY 20/21 | 28.02.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 28. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 50 AS 1787/19 | 13.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 9 AS 521/20 B | 24.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 50 AS 1787/19 | 13.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 9 AS 521/20 B | 24.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 21 P 78/18 | 09.05.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 P 32/22 | 21.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 10/23 B | 18.10.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 28. November 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 110/23 | 21.07.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 28. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 BA 1671/21 | 27.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 28. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 3 U 30/23 | 23.08.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 28. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 6 AL 145/21 | 24.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 28/22 | 04.05.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Koblenz | 28. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 8 AL 84/16 | 26.04.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 40/21 | 13.10.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 29 AS 3957/18 | 13.04.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 525/21 | 25.05.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 36 AL 531/14 | 09.11.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 187/17 | 17.08.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 AL 213/20 | 24.02.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 35/23 | 25.05.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 120 AL 215/19 | 29.08.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 27. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 43 AS 5054/19 | 11.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1078/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 27. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 R 142/19 | 14.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 217/20 | 19.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 76/23 AR | 19.10.2023 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 27. November 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 89 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 89 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 89 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2200, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 845/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-845-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-845-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150003 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1232/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1232-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1232-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149998 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 37/23 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-37-23-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-37-23-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149993 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 350/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-350-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-350-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 739/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-739-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-739-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149984 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 132/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-132-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-132-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149980 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 281/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-281-21-kh-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-281-21-kh-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149975 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 98/23 B ER L 7 AS 99/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-98-23-b-er-l-7-as-99-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-98-23-b-er-l-7-as-99-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 767/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-767-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-767-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143897 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 59 KR 547/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-59-kr-547-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-59-kr-547-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139435 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AY 20/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ay-20-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ay-20-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139101 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 521/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-521-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-521-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139100 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 521/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-521-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:06:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:06:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-521-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137280 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 P 32/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-p-32-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-p-32-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137000 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 110/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-110-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-110-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 BA 1671/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-ba-1671-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-ba-1671-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130941 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 30/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-30-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-30-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71254 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 28/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-28-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:35:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:35:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-28-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161434 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 40/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-40-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-40-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161432 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 525/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-525-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-525-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161430 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 187/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-187-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-187-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 35/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-35-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-35-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150312 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 120 AL 215/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-120-al-215-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-120-al-215-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150309 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 43 AS 5054/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-43-as-5054-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-43-as-5054-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149992 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 142/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-142-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-142-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 845/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-845-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-845-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => dc0e663c1b85276c14b6e9237cf56ac6 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:01cfdcbca9e11ecf3202ba991dad029d:0.64782400 1746947885 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.