| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 14 KN 457/15 | 27.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 1019/20 | 26.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 171/22 B | 04.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 17. November 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 49 KR 4921/19 | 20.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 405/21 | 31.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 17/22 B | 09.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 17. November 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 29 U 536/15 | 17.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 535/17 | 09.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 169/22 B | 27.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 17. November 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 28 R 560/19 | 14.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 866/20 | 28.05.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 17. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 1124/19 | 13.07.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 376/22 | 25.10.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 17. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 3 R 257/17 | 28.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 13/20 | 24.08.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 17. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 3 R 257/17 | 28.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 13/20 | 24.08.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 17. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 16 BA 87/20 ER | 17.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 53/21 B ER | 29.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 52 R 374/17 | 04.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 R 189/19 | 17.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KR 1429/18 | 29.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 345/19 | 19.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. November 2023 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 SF 62/23 ERI | 21.03.2023 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 AS 730/19 | 24.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 847/22 NZB | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 31 KR 1964/20 | 15.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 770/21 | 09.02.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 50 AS 2057/18 | 10.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 59/20 | 17.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 20 AS 39/23 ER | 02.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 281/23 B ER, L 6 AS 282/23 B | 03.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 46 KR 340/20 | 22.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 86/21 KH | 08.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 46 KR 340/20 | 22.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 86/21 KH | 08.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 46 R 173/09 | 25.11.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 108/14 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 15 SB 256/20 | 13.10.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 SB 152/22 | 20.07.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 16. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 AS 308/23 | 08.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 16. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 12 KR 462/21 | 16.03.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 16. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 5 SB 369/17 | 10.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 11/20 | 25.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 3/22 R | 15.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. November 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 210 KR 1791/13 | 15.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 48/18 | 29.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 10/21 R | 14.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. November 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 11 U 149/16 | 27.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 4/19 | 11.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 19/21 R | 22.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. November 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 15 U 194/19 | 03.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 U 117/20 | 22.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 9/21 R | 22.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. November 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 94 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 94 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 94 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2325, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 1019/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-1019-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-1019-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 405/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-405-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-405-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149697 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 U 535/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-u-535-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-u-535-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149692 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 866/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-866-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-866-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136995 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 376/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-376-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-376-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 13/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-13-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-13-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 13/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-13-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-13-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 53/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-53-21-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-53-21-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149681 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 189/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-189-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-189-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149676 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 345/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-345-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-345-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SF 62/23 ERI [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sf-62-23-eri [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sf-62-23-eri/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149666 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 847/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-847-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-847-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149661 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 770/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-770-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-770-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 59/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-59-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-59-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149651 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 281/23 B ER, L 6 AS 282/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-281-23-b-er-l-6-as-282-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-281-23-b-er-l-6-as-282-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 86/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-86-21-kh-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-86-21-kh-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149645 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 86/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-86-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-86-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 108/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-108-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-108-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140361 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 SB 256/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-sb-256-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-sb-256-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140359 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AS 308/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-as-308-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-as-308-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 462/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-462-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-462-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 3/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-3-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-3-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 10/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-10-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-10-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88010 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 19/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-19-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-19-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88009 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 9/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-9-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-9-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 1019/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-1019-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-1019-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 70b6cc918de7d5e32a551565aa2ace2d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6512d51a805a9a2582b516f8f41c8846:0.36108300 1747247974 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.