Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 AL 290/19 | 19.06.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 66/23 B | 11.10.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 26 AL 6/22 | 16.08.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 63/22 | 17.08.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 21 AS 829/23 ER | 31.08.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 533/23 B ER | 12.10.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 13 R 487/20 ZV | 14.08.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 421/23 ZV | 06.11.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 24 AS 674/17 | 12.06.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 860/19 B PKH | 24.07.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 1163/21 ZV zuvor S 24 R 1163/21 ZV | 26.07.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 392/23 ZV | 06.11.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | L 3 AS 2391/23 ER-B | 17.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 2391/23 ER-B | 31.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Köln | S 19 AS 4242/20 | 16.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 456/21 | 20.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Köln | S 6 AS 1714/21 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 661/22 NZB | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 107 AL 428/20 | 12.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 AL 3/23 B | 17.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 21 AL 193/20 | 22.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 AL 38/22 B | 06.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 16 U 266/18 | 29.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 618/18 | 26.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 33 AS 1155/21 | 12.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 AS 1526/22 B | 05.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 17 KR 2088/20 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 714/22 B | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 397/19 | 24.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 440/20 | 17.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 531/22 | 08.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. November 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 R 795/15 | 30.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 16/21 | 24.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 1/23 B | 25.09.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 15. November 2023 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 R 795/15 | 30.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 16/21 | 24.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 1/23 B | 25.09.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 15. November 2023 |
Sozialgericht Münster | S 2 AS 304/19 + S 2 AS 305/19 | 27.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 AS 205/22 B + L 5 AS 206/22 B | 27.07.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 15. November 2023 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 256/21 EK AS | 24.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. November 2023 | ||||
- | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 255/21 EK AS | 24.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. November 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 101 AS 16763/16 | 17.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 319/19 | 21.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 3 U 131/17 WA | 21.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 13. November 2023 | ||||
Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 P 104/17 | 27.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 81/19 | 15.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. November 2023 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 103 AL 541/20 | 10.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 122/22 NZB | 17.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. November 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 95 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 95 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 95 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2350, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161426 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 66/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-66-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-66-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161424 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 63/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-63-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-63-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161423 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 533/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-533-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-533-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 421/23 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-421-23-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-421-23-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161418 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 860/19 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-860-19-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-860-19-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 392/23 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-392-23-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-392-23-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159740 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 2391/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-2391-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:12:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:12:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-2391-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149634 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 456/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-456-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-456-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149629 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 661/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-661-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-661-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149624 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 3/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-3-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-3-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AL 38/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-al-38-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-al-38-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 U 618/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-u-618-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-u-618-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149609 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 1526/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-1526-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-1526-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 714/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-714-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-714-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149599 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 440/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-440-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-440-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143891 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 531/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-531-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-531-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137257 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 795/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-795-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-795-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 16/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-16-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-16-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132800 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 205/22 B + L 5 AS 206/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-205-22-b-l-5-as-206-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-205-22-b-l-5-as-206-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 256/21 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-256-21-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-256-21-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129222 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 255/21 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-255-21-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-255-21-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129219 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 34 AS 319/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-34-as-319-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-34-as-319-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149974 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 131/17 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-131-17-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-131-17-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149594 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 81/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-81-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-81-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 122/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-122-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-122-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161426 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 66/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-66-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-66-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 601208943c4a0171ce0b6d31527ac731 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:52ee10ff63cf7e3aaaf58c009cc8e5d9:0.35108500 1747248536 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.