| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 20 SF 8/22 E | 05.12.2022 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 921/22 B | 26.09.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 10. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 10 U 2882/18 | 08.10.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1091/20 | 25.05.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 10. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 R 151/23 ER | 25.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 9. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 34 KR 3/23 ER | 02.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 161/23 B ER | 11.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 31 P 451/21 | 11.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 117/22 B | 23.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 3/23 AR | 11.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. November 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 43 AS 3106/18 | 24.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1353/21 | 31.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 53 AS 5886/19 | 13.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1374/22 | 26.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 19 AS 5449/19 | 28.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1755/22 | 31.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 79/23 B | 08.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. November 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 2 AS 4840/16 | 04.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 2089/19 | 31.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 5 AL 671/19 | 19.02.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 9. November 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 1 AS 393/19 | 20.02.2023 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 139/23 | 25.10.2023 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 9. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 306/21 | 14.11.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 12/23 | 17.05.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 44 U 30/20 | 09.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 60/21 | 05.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 32 SB 162/18 | 22.02.2022 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 2/22 R | 15.06.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 127/19 | 18.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 295/20 | 07.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 11/22 R | 13.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. November 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 50 KR 1671/16 | 28.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 336/19 | 17.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 5/22 R | 19.04.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. November 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 14 U 1174/17 | 29.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2719/20 | 21.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 U 3602/20 | 11.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1547/22 | 25.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 U 3602/20 | 11.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1547/22 | 25.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 18 SB 3129/21 | 09.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 1641/23 | 29.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 11 AL 187/21 | 07.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 3484/21 | 13.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 U 2971/21 | 28.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 1620/22 | 13.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 10 R 115/23 | 22.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 1138/23 | 13.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 R 2393/21 | 13.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 1970/22 | 13.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 U 66/18 | 24.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 3422/20 | 21.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. November 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 97 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 97 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 97 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 2400, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 921/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-921-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-921-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131420 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1091/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1091-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1091-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149969 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 151/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-151-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-151-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 161/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-161-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-161-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 117/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-117-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-117-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149521 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1353/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1353-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1353-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1374/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1374-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:42:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:42:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1374-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149511 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1755/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1755-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1755-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149506 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2089/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2089-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2089-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143885 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 671/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-671-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:44:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:44:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-671-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136985 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 139/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-139-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-139-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130836 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 12/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-12-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:12:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:12:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-12-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129216 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 60/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-60-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-60-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 2/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-2-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-2-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88007 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 11/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-11-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-11-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88006 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 5/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-5-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:17:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:17:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-5-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2719/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2719-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:11:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:11:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2719-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1547/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1547-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:11:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:11:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1547-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1547/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1547-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:11:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:11:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1547-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 1641/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-1641-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:11:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:11:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-1641-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159696 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 3484/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-3484-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:11:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:11:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-3484-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159693 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 1620/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-1620-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:11:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:11:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-1620-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 1138/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-1138-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:11:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:11:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-1138-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 1970/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-1970-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:11:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:11:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-1970-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159684 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 3422/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-3422-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:11:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:11:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-3422-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 921/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-921-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-921-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 206ae13b0d58dc41a0967626b9eea149 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2f11b84bae1793e656ba69356097ae0a:0.94022000 1747269670 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.